Ex Parte Aleles et al - Page 2



             Appeal No. 2006-2248                                                                               
             Application No. 10/158,618                                                                         

                            DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134                                            
                   A.     Introduction                                                                          
                          1.    Applicants appeal from a final rejection entered May 14, 2003.                  
                          2.    The reissue application on appeal seeks to reissue U.S. Patent                  
             6,068,847, issued May 30, 2000, based on application 08/940,880, filed September                   
             30, 1997.                                                                                          
                          3.    The reissue application contains claims 1-40.                                   
                          4.    Claims 1-19 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 251 on the                     
             grounds that the reissue declaration is defective.                                                 
                          5.    Claims 2-19 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 251 on the                     
             grounds that these claims seek to recapture subject matter surrendered when the                    
             patent sought to be reissued was granted.                                                          
                          6.    Claims 20-40, the remaining claims, have been withdrawn from                    
             consideration as being directed to non-elected subject matter and are not on appeal                
             before this Board (Reissue final rejection at page 2).                                             
                          7.    The principal issues before the Board are whether Applicants                    
             have established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-19 based on a                       
             defective reissue declaration and erred in rejecting claims 2-19 based on recapture.               

                                                      - 2 -                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007