The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PENNINGTON S. HOPKINS ____________ Appeal No. 2006-2280 Application No. 10/244,011 Technology Center 3600 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CRAWFORD, LEVY and HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-28, all of the claims pending in the application. We affirm-in-part and enter new grounds of rejection of claims 17, 18 and 26-28 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007