Appeal No. 2006-2467 Page 7 Application No. 10/157,644 fructose snack since it may cause hyperglycemia. Therefore, the time frame in which the composition is administered is a manipulatable parameter that is defined by the patient’s condition, i.e. the blood sugar profile. Id. at 4-5. Again appellants argue that “[n]one of the references disclose the administration of fructose from 10-90 minutes before a meal or snack.” Appeal Brief, page 7. We agree, and the rejection is reversed. Moore looks at plasma glucose concentrations after administration of glucose or glucose supplemented with fructose, wherein blood samples were obtained twice before and every 15 minutes after administration, for a period of two hours. Thus, there is no discussion in either Anderson or Moore of when the fructose supplementation was given to the subjects relative to a meal or snack. Lundstrom merely teaches an afternoon snack, given between lunch and dinner, of a piece of fruit. See id. at 26. There is no discussion of the timing of lunch, the afternoon snack, and dinner. Thus, again, there is no suggestion in the Lundstrom reference, or in the combination, that a fructose supplement should be administered 10 to 90 minutes before a meal. OTHER ISSUES The examiner should consider the patentability of the claims in view of the Van de Ven5 reference, the abstract of which accompanies this opinion. In that 5 Van de Ven et al., “Effects of liquid preloads with different fructose/fibre concentrations on subsequent food intake and ratings of hunger in women,” Appetite, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 139-46 (1994) (abstract only).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007