The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JEFFREY. L. HENGSBACH _____________ Appeal No. 2006-2560 Application No. 10/315,422 Technology Center 3700 ______________ HEARD: October 18, 2006 _______________ Before GROSS, LEVY, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of claims 1 through 30 and 47 through 50. For the reasons stated infra we will sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 30 and 47 through 50.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007