Ex Parte Hengsbach - Page 8



                  Appeal No. 2006-2560                                                                                           
                  Application No. 10/315,422                                                                                     

                          On pages 19 and 20 of the brief, appellant argues, that there is no motivation to                      
                  modify Ranson with Deschamps’ transparent cover sheet.  Appellant asserts that “one                            
                  skilled in the art can not be assured that the thin transparent laminating sheet of the type                   
                  disclosed by the ‘576 [Deschamps] patent could successfully be used in the Ranson cover                        
                  without being scorched, distorted or damaged by the heated anvil or forming apparatus.”                        
                  On pages 19 and 20 of the brief, appellant asserts that the substitution of the Deschamps                      
                  coversheet for Ranson’s coversheet would defeat Ranson’s stated purpose of durability                          
                  and low cost.  Further, on page 21 of the brief, appellant argues:                                             
                          Moreover, volume purchasers such as libraries and schools would be discouraged                         
                          from laminating the Ranson cover sheet (60) with the '576 transparent sheet                            
                          because high volume use of the materials would cause the sheet to peel away                            
                          from the cover, crack and/or come loose from the outer surface of the Ranson                           
                          cover - lending to costly and time-consuming maintenance of the book collection                        
                          and/or requiring frequent replacement of the cover. Further, there is no reasonable                    
                          expectation that the Ranson cover sheet laminated with a transparent sheet layer                       
                          can be successfully formed into a flat back cover by the Ranson flat-back, casing                      
                          apparatus without damaging the transparent sheet or alternatively causing the                          
                          transparent sheet to separate, crack or peel away from the cover sheet (60) during                     
                          heated formation. Thus, such a modification clearly and unequivocally teaches                          
                          away from the present invention, which eliminates the need for lamination or UV                        
                          coatings. See Appellant's Specification, page 3, paragraph 9.                                          
                          Appellant’s arguments on pages 19 through 22 of the brief have not persuaded us                        
                  of error in the examiner’s rejection.  Initially we note that appellant’s arguments are                        
                  premised on Ranson teaching an opaque cover sheet, a conclusion with which we do not                           
                  agree or find to be supported by convincing evidence.  As discussed supra, Ranson                              
                  teaches use of several materials for use as the cover sheet, and the examiner has provided                     
                  evidence that some of them are transparent.  Ranson teaches that care should be taken in                       
                  selecting the temperature of the heating element to prevent scorching.  See column 3,                          
                  lines 59 through 65.  As Ranson’s selection of cover materials includes potentially                            
                  transparent materials, and there is no convincing evidence to establish that transparent                       
                  materials are any more susceptible to scorching than the similar non transparent                               
                  materials,                                                                                                     



                                                               8                                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007