Appeal No. 2006-2707
Application No. 09/749,792
demanding level input for determining the rate of reduction of
the temperature-related frequency. It is therefore our view,
after consideration of the record before us, that the evidence
relied upon and the level of skill in the particular art would
have suggested to the ordinarily skilled artisan the invention as
set forth in claims 18 through 20. Accordingly, we will sustain
the Examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 18 through 20.
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing discussion, we have sustained the
Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1 through 20 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. Therefore, we affirm.
15
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007