Ex Parte Jo et al - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                              
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                               
                                                         __________                                                               
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                               
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                         __________                                                               
                                                           Ex parte                                                               
                              YOSHIO JO, MOTONORI AOSHIMA, KOJI TANABE,                                                           
                                   KOICHI MATSUSHITA, and TOSHIKI INOUE                                                           
                                                         __________                                                               
                                                   Appeal No. 2006-0647                                                           
                                                Application No. 10/069,561                                                        
                                                  Technology Center 1600                                                          
                                                         __________                                                               
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                         __________                                                               


                   Before SCHEINER, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                   SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               
                          Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of                                     
                   claims 34, 36-55, 57-60, and 62-74, all the claims remaining, under 35                                         
                   U.S.C. § 103.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We reverse.                                       
                                                        DISCUSSION                                                                
                          The present invention is directed to a “soluble trauma-healing                                          
                   hemostatic cellulose fiber containing coagulation protein[,]” which “readily                                   
                   dissolve[s] on contact with blood,” and “exhibit[s] a hemostatic effect due to                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013