1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
2 and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 __________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 __________________
10
11 Ex parte SURFCONTROL, INC.
12
13 Appeal No. 2006-1084
14 Reexamination Control Number 90/006,334
15 Patent No. 6,219,786 B1
16 Technology Center 2100
17 __________________
18
19 On Brief
20 Decided: February 27, 2007
21 __________________
22
23
24 Before LEE E. BARRETT, JAMESON LEE and JAMES T. MOORE,
25 Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27 LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30 A. Statement of the Case
31 This is a decision on appeal by the Patent Owner under 35 U.S.C.
32 § 134(b) and § 306 from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of the Claims 1-18
33 in Patent No. 6,219,786 B1. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013