Appeal No. 2006-1084
Reexamination Control No. 90/006,334
1 The Examiner rejected claims 2, 3 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
2 being unpatentable over Abraham and Stein.
3
4 B. Issues
5 Has the Examiner established unpatentability of claims 15-18 under
6 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, for indefiniteness?
7 Has the Examiner established unpatentability of claims 1, 4-12, and
8 14-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e), as anticipated by Abraham?
9 Has the Examiner established unpatentability of claims 1, 4, 9 and 15
10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e), as anticipated by Cirasole?
11 Has the Examiner established unpatentability of claims 1-9 and 11-18
12 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), as anticipated by Engel?
13 Has the Examiner established unpatentability of claim 10 under
14 35 U.S.C. § 103, for obviousness based on Engel and Shwed?
15 Has the Examiner established unpatentability of claims 2, 3, and 13
16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, for obviousness based on Abraham and Lodin?
17 Has the Examiner established unpatentability of claims 2, 3 and 13
18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, for obviousness based on Abraham and Stein?
19
20 C. Summary of the Decision
21 No. The Examiner has not established the unpatentability of any
22 claims under any ground.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013