Ex Parte King et al - Page 10

            Appeal Number: 2006-1385                                                                          
            Application Number: 10/452,753                                                                    

            unpatentable over Shridhara in view of Beesley, and additionally because                          
            Shridhara discloses a PN code generator (Fig. 3) that becomes disabled when the                   
            GPS reception is disabled.                                                                        
                We turn next to claim 5.  We are not persuaded by Appellants’ assertion (Br. 8)               
            that Shridhara and Beesley do not disclose periodically monitoring a coherent                     
            correlator output.  We sustain the rejection of claim 5 for the reasons we sustained              
            the rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                      
            Shridhara in view of Beesley, and additionally because the disclosure in Shridhara                
            (col. 4, ll. 34-36) of detecting a sudden rise in the correlator chain output would               
            have suggested to an artisan to periodically monitor a coherent correlator output.                
                We turn next to claim 6.  We are not persuaded by Appellants’ assertion (Br. 8)               
            that Shridhara and Beesley do not disclose:                                                       
                   blanking the satellite positioning system receiver with the blanking signal                
                   includes at least one of disregarding an output of a signal correlator of the              
                   satellite positioning system receiver during blanking periods, applying zero               
                   input to the signal correlator of the satellite positioning system receiver                
                   during blanking periods, and suspending operation of the signal correlator                 
                   operation of the satellite positioning system receiver during blanking                     
                   periods.                                                                                   
                In Shridhara, we find that because the signal correlator (311) is integrated in               
            the GPS receiver (col. 6, ll. 13-17 and Fig. 3), the operation of the signal correlator           
            becomes suspended when the jamming signal is detected and the GPS reception is                    
            subsequently disabled.  From our review of the record, we agree with the Examiner                 
            that the teachings of Shridhara would have suggested to an artisan the invention set              
            forth in claim 6, and are not convinced of any error on the part of the Examiner in               
            rejecting claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shridhara in                
            view of Beesley.  Accordingly, the rejection of claim 6 is sustained.                             
                                                     10                                                       


Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013