Appeal Number: 2006-1385
Application Number: 10/452,753
obviousness of claim 25. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection of claim 25
under U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shridhara in view of Fielder.
We turn next to claim 26. We reverse the rejection of claim 26 due to its
dependency from claim 25, and the deficiencies of Fielder.
20
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013