Appeal Number: 2006-1385
Application Number: 10/452,753
CONCLUSION
• The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-6, 8, 10-13, 15-16, 18-19 and
23, 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shridhara in
view of Beesley is affirmed. The rejection of claims 7, 9, 14, 17, 24, 26
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shridhara in view of
Beesley is reversed.
• The rejection of claims 1-19 and 23-26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Shridhara in view of Fielder is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ROBERT E. NAPPI ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LINDA E. HORNER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
21
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013