Ex Parte Eckl - Page 1

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                        for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                         Ex parte JOHN K. ECKL                                                
                                           Appeal No. 2006-1650                                               
                                        Application No. 09/903,500                                            
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                         Decided: March 29, 2007                                              
            Before WILLIAM F. PATE, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and ANTON W. FETTING,                                   
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                     
            WILLIAM F. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                                        PRELIMINARY MATTERS                                                   
                   A party, such as Appellant, dissatisfied with a Decision of the Board in an ex             
            parte appeal of an application has two courses of action. The party may request                   
            rehearing (reconsideration) under 37 C.F.R.  41.52, or the party may seek judicial               
            review by appeal or civil action. See 37 C.F.R.  1.197(b) and 37 C.F.R.                         
            1.304(a)(1). The ex parte patent regulations and the jurisprudence do not provide                 

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013