Ex Parte Noe et al - Page 2

             Appeal Number: 2006-1694                                                                           
             Application Number: 10/131,607                                                                     

                                              THE INVENTION                                                     
                   The appellants claim a method for eliminating crossbow in a metal strip.                     
             Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                           
                   1. A method of eliminating crossbow in metal strip in a strip processing line,               
             comprising the steps of:                                                                           
                   (a) passing metal strip along said strip processing line through a strip                     
             processing device;                                                                                 
             (b) detecting crossbow in said strip; and                                                          
             (c) immediately upstream of said strip processing device,                                          
             eliminating said crossbow by pressing a correcting roller against said strip between               
             two support rolls to a variable depth determined by a detected degree of crossbow,                 
             and wherein in step (b) the crossbow of the strip is measured and a measured value                 
             of the crossbow is compared with a setpoint value to generate an error signal                      
             determining the depth to which said correcting roller is displaced against said strip              
             between said support roll thereby eliminating the crossbow in said strip.                          
                                             THE REFERENCES                                                     
             Reesor                         US 3,416,340         Dec. 17, 1968                                  
             Mücke et al. (Mücke)         US 5,953,946         Sep. 21, 1999                                    
                                             THE REJECTIONS                                                     
                   The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 2, 8, 9 and 11 under                         
             35 U.S.C. § 103 over Mücke; claims 1, 8 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Reesor;                   
             and claims 3 and 5-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, enablement                            
             requirement.                                                                                       






                                                       2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013