Appeal No. 2006-1711
Application No. 10/805,935
backpack enclosure that one skilled in the art would have found no suggestion in
May to modify the zipper arrangement of the Williams enclosure as proposed by
the examiner.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the rejections of claims 1-9, 11-19 and 21-24 as being
anticipated by Williams and claims 1-24 as being unpatentable over Williams are
sustained and the rejection of claims 10 and 20 as being unpatentable over
Williams in view of May is reversed. A rejection of each of the claims on appeal
having been sustained, the examiner’s decision is affirmed.
above the head of the wearer.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013