The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EARLE HARRY SHERROD, STEPHEN BRADFORD COOK,
DAVID ARTHUR FELL, CORNELIS JACOBUS BOSSELAAR,
COURTNEY M. NELSON, PAUL JOSEPH DATTA and
MARY ANNE BRUEMMER-PRESTLEY
____________
Appeal 2006-1804
Application 09/825,609
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: February 28, 2007
____________
Before HUBERT C. LORIN, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and
ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Earle Harry Sherrod et al. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-3, 6, 9-14, and 18-22, the
only claims pending in the application. We have jurisdiction over this
appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013