The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DARYL S. MEREDITH, THOMAS R. KAYE JR,
THOMAS TREVOR BLUDIS, MARIA I. KENYON, WILLIAM R. STUMPF,
MICHAEL L. O'BANION, CRAIG A. OKTAVEC,
STUART J. WRIGHT, MARK E. BRUNSON and
CARRIE L. PUSCHMANN
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1915
Application No. 10/056,312
Technology Center 3700
____________
Before JENNIFER D. BAHR, STUART S. LEVY, and ROBERT E. NAPPI,
Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Daryl S. Meredith et al. (appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s decision rejecting claim 1. Claims 2-24 have been canceled. We have
jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013