The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte HARRY BUSSEY JR and HARRY (BUDDY) BUSSEY III ___________ Appeal No. 2006-1962 Application No. 10/133,776 Technology Center 3700 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Decided: February 27, 2007 ___________ Before, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, LINDA E. HORNER, and JENNIFER D. BAHR Administrative Patent Judges. MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims and, which are all of the claims 1 to 7, and 22 to 25. Claims 8 to 21 and 26 to 34 have been withdrawn from consideration. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013