Appeal Number: 2006-1962
Application Number: 10/133,776
The examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Spertus is sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as being anticipated by Fuss is sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 1- 3, 22 to 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as being anticipated by Bainbridge is sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claim 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Bainbridge is not sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JENNIFER D. BAHR ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LINDA E. HORNER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013