Ex Parte Bhattacharya et al - Page 5




             Appeal No. 2006-2034                                                        Page 5                      
             Application No. 10/744,801                                                                              


                    characteristic, a voltage characteristic and a temperature characteristic of                     
                    the reference PMOS device. . . .                                                                 

             Independent claim 18 includes similar limitations.  In other words, the limitations require             
             a reference signal that is a function of at least one of a process characteristic, a voltage            
             characteristic, and a temperature characteristic of an NMOS device and another                          
             reference signal that is a function of at least one of a process characteristic, a voltage              
             characteristic and a temperature characteristic of a PMOS device.                                       


                                          B. ANTICIPATION DETERMINATION                                              
                    "Having construed the claim limitations at issue, we now compare the claims to                   
             the prior art to determine if the prior art anticipates those claims."  In re Cruciferous               
             Sprout Litig., 301 F.3d 1343, 1349, 64 USPQ2d 1202, 1206 (Fed. Cir. 2002).  "A claim                    
             is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is found, either                
             expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference."  Verdegaal Bros., Inc.             
             v. Union Oil Co., 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (citing                       
             Structural Rubber Prods. Co. v. Park Rubber Co., 749 F.2d 707, 715, 223 USPQ 1264,                      
             1270 (Fed. Cir. 1984); Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548, 220                        
             USPQ 193, 198 (Fed. Cir. 1983); Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 713 F.2d 760, 771,                      
             218 USPQ 781, 789 (Fed. Cir. 1983)).  "[A]bsence from the reference of any claimed                      








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013