Ex Parte Bhattacharya et al - Page 7




             Appeal No. 2006-2034                                                        Page 7                      
             Application No. 10/744,801                                                                              


             characteristic, and a temperature characteristic of an NMOS device.  For its part, the                  
             reference teaches that the constant current I4 is provided by the following equation:                   


                                                                                                                    
             In the equation, R2 is the resistance value of resistor 309, and Vbe is "the diffusion                  
             voltage of transistors 306 and 307," (col. 9, ll. 16-17), which are "NPN transistors. . . ."            
             (Id. at l. 11.)  Because the reference's constant current I4 is a function of characteristics           
             of a resistor and two NPN transistors, rather than a characteristic of an NMOS                          
             transistor, we disagree with the examiner's allegation that I4 constitutes a reference                  
             signal that is a function of at least one of a process characteristic, a voltage                        
             characteristic and a temperature characteristic of an NMOS device.                                      


                    The absence of a reference signal that is a function of at least one of a process                
             characteristic, a voltage characteristic, and a temperature characteristic of an NMOS                   
             device negates anticipation.  Therefore, we reverse the anticipation rejection of claims 1              
             and 18 and of claim 25, which depends from the former claim.                                            


                                                 III. CONCLUSION                                                     
                    In summary, the rejection of claims 1, 18, and 25 under § 102(b) is reversed.                    








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013