Appeal 2006-2107 Application 09/969,833 value being stored in the memory and utilizable to facilitate subsequent computation of another one of the output values. The Examiner rejected claims 1-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The Examiner entered a Final Rejection on May 4, 2005. Appellant appealed from the Final Rejection. An Appeal Brief (the Brief) was filed on November 8, 2005. The Examiner entered an Examiner’s Answer (the Answer) on January 26, 2006. Appellant did not file a Reply Brief. We affirm. II. ISSUE The sole issue before us is whether Appellant has established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being directed to non-statutory subject matter. III. FINDINGS OF FACT The following findings of fact are supported by a preponderance of the evidence. 1. Appellant invented a method, apparatus, and machine readable medium (storing one or more programs) for generating one or more output values of a one-way chain. (Specification 4). 2. One-way chains are used in processor based cryptographic applications such as encryption, decryption, digital signatures, message authentication, user and device authentication, micro-payments, etc. (Specification 1:13-15 and 4:1-7). 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013