Appeal No. 2006-2284 Page 15 Application No. 09/912,211 interrogator 43, and . . . portable RFID scanners 42, both of which are used for identifying articles 22 presented at the checkout station 50." (Col. 8, ll. 12-18.) Because an object of Bowers' inventory control system is to determine whether articles are in the proper location, (see col. 1, ll. 38-41), we find that having more than one interrogator record the location of the same article would have lead to ambiguity. Figure 1 of the reference, for example, shows that the exterior book drop 32 is near the smart pedestals 36 and the fixed interrogators 43 and portable scanners 42 of the checkout station 50. If an article in the book drop 32 was scanned by interrogators of the smart pedestals 36, the fixed interrogators 43, and the portable scanners 42, besides being scanned by the interrogator of the book drop, the system might identify the article as simultaneously being located in the book drop, between the pedestals, and in the checkout area, which would have lead to uncertainty as to the precise location of the article. "An object tracking and management system and method using radio-frequency identification ('RFID') tags is [similarly] disclosed," (abs., ll. 1-3), by Francis. As aforementioned, the appellants admit that Francis teaches "RF shielding. . . ." (Reply Br. at 7.) More specifically, "[a]n RF shield 410, such as a metal plate, metal screen or other RF reflective or absorbant [sic] material, is positioned between," (col. 9, ll. 53-55),Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013