The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte MASUMI SAKAI ____________________ Appeal 2006-2381 Application 09/779,125 Technology Center 2800 ____________________ Decided: March 13, 2007 ____________________ Before: HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection of claims 12, 13, 15, and 16. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). Appellant invented a furnace-type atomic absorption spectrophotometer that heats a sample held in an electrically-conductive tube by controlling a heating current passed to the tube. After atomizing thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013