Ex Parte Anderfaas - Page 2

                      Appeal 2006-2483                                                                                                                 
                      Application 10/371,785                                                                                                           
                               1.   A rotary damper, comprising:                                                                                       
                               a housing;                                                                                                              
                               a first plurality of plates disposed within the housing;                                                                
                               a second plurality of plates disposed within the housing and                                                            
                                       interleaved with the first plurality of plates, the second                                                      
                                       plurality of plates capable of moving relative to the first                                                     
                                       plurality of plates;                                                                                            
                               a magnetorheological fluid contained within the housing and residing                                                    
                                       in the interleave of the first and second plurality of plates; and                                              
                               a magnetic flux generator capable of driving a magnetic flux                                                            
                                       through the magnetorheological fluid in the interleave in a                                                     
                                       direction transverse to the orientation of the plates and capable                                               
                                       of varying the strength of the driven magnetic flux.                                                            

                                                            THE REFERENCES                                                                             
                      Drutchas                                        US 4,790,522              Dec. 13, 1988                                          
                      Daniels                                              US 5,573,088             Nov. 12, 1996                                      
                      Nakanishi (JP ‘220)1(as translated)     JP 62-251220             Nov.  2, 1987                                                   
                      Duchovskou (WO ‘181) (as translated)  WO 94/01181             Jan.  20, 1994                                                     

                                                             THE REJECTIONS                                                                            
                               The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 3-8, 11, 13-19, 22, 24-                                                 
                      29, 32, 34-39, 42, 44-49 and 52 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                                                       
                      Daniels; claims 1, 3-11, 14-22 and 24-31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                                             
                      anticipated by WO ‘181; claims 32, 34-42 and 44-51 under                                                                         
                      35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by JP ‘220; and claims 2, 12, 23, 33 and                                                       
                                                                                                                                                      
                      1 Copies of the English translations of  JP ‘220 and WO ‘181 are provided to1                                                                                                                               
                      the Appellant with this decision.                                                                                                
                                                                          2                                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013