Appeal 2006-2483
Application 10/371,785
in the direction transverse to the magnetic pole boards to orient the magnetic
particles in that direction such that the viscosity increase suppresses the
relative rotation of the magnetic pole boards.
Hence, we are not convinced of reversible error in the rejection over
JP ‘220.
DECISION
The rejections of claims 1, 3-8, 11, 13-19, 22, 24-29, 32, 34-39, 42,
44-49 and 52 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Daniels, claims 1, 3-11, 14-22
and 24-31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over WO ‘181, claims 32, 34-42 and
44-51 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over JP ‘220, and claims 2, 12, 23, 33 and
43 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over WO ‘181 in view of Daniels or Drutchas, are
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(2006).
AFFIRMED
hh
WILLIAMS, MORGAN & AMERSON
10333 RICHMOND, SUITE 1100
HOUSTON, TX 77042
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013