The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANDREAS TERMIN, PETER GROOTENHUIS, DEAN
WILSON, VALENTINA MOLTENI and LONG MAO
__________
Appeal 2006-2573
Application 10/192,055
Technology Center 1600
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before SCHEINER, GREEN, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 15. Claim 1 is representative of
the claims on appeal, and is attached as Appendix I. Claims 1, 2 and 15
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Kasahara.1 We
affirm.
1 Kasahara et al. (Kasahara), WO 92/16527, published October 1, 1992 (as
translated).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013