Appeal 2006-2594 Application 10/034,394 each graphical image with a placeholder having a label corresponding to a button. Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claim 1 and of claims 2-7 and 15-21, which fall therewith. V. CONTROLLER FOR SCANNING AND REPLACING The examiner makes the following finding. Bickmore discloses a converter for automatically adapting markup language documents for display in small areas comprising: a conversion controller scanning a portion of markup language source selected for display for tags associated with graphical elements and replacing each detected graphical element (Column 4 lines 60-63, Column 5 lines 1-2) within the selected markup language source portion with one of a plurality of placeholders (Column 11 lines 23-26). (Answer 3.) Observing that "[t]his element requires a controller that both scans a portion of source for tags and automatically replaces each detected graphical element with one of the plurality of placeholders," (Br. 14), the Appellant alleges, "Nothing in Bickmore or Patil, or any combination of them, appears to teach this element as described with relation to all other elements of this claim." (Id.) Therefore, the issue is whether the combination of references would have suggested a controller that scans a document for tags associated with graphical images and replaces each graphical image with a placeholder having a label corresponding to a button. A. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Claim 8 recites in pertinent part the following limitations: "a conversion controller scanning a selected display portion of source [sic] for the markup language document for tags associated with graphical 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013