Ex Parte Seltzer et al - Page 1

                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                       Ex parte RAYMOND SELTZER,                                              
                         DAVID DEVORE, GLEN T. CUNKLE, CYRIL HEITNER,                                         
                                JOHN A. SCHMIDT, PETER F. MCGARRY,                                            
                             JEAN-PIERRE WOLF, and RANDALL B. NELSON                                          
                                            Appeal No. 2006-2666                                              
                                         Application No. 10/140,531                                           
                                            Technology Center 1700                                            
                                            Decided:  May 30, 2007                                            

            Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F.  WARREN, and                                                  
            JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
            SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                   This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of claims 44-               
            54.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6                                                     


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013