Ex Parte Seltzer et al - Page 3



            Appeal No. 2006-2666                                                                              
            Application No. 10/140,531                                                                        
                         X is an inorganic or organic anion; and                                              
                         the total charge of cations h is equal to the total charge of                        
                   anions j.                                                                                  

                   The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting the appealed                  
            claims:                                                                                           
            Seltzer     US 5,051,511    Sept. 24, 1991                                                        
            Rodgers     US 5,459,222   Oct.  17, 1995                                                         
                   Claims 44 to 54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable                    
            over the combination of Seltzer and Rodgers.  (Answer 3-5).  We affirm the                        
            rejection.                                                                                        
                   Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the Examiner                  
            and the Appellants regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the                  
            Answer (mailed April 13, 2006) for the Examiner's reasoning in support of the                     
            rejection, and to the Brief (filed April 3, 2006) for the Appellants’ arguments                   
            thereagainst.                                                                                     
                                                 OPINION                                                      
                   Upon careful review of the respective positions advanced by Appellants and                 
            the Examiner, we Affirm for the reasons advanced by the Examiner and add the                      
            following primarily for emphasis.                                                                 
                   Appellants argue that polyurethane and polyester coatings are unknown as                   
            paper coatings and that there is no motivation provided to combine the two                        
            references in order to solve the present problem (Br. 10).  Appellants also present a             
                                                  3                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013