The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ULRICH GOEBEL,
ELMAR HUBER and ALBERT-ANDREAS
______________
Appeal 2006-2671
Application 09/508,572
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: April 30, 2007
_______________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 7 through 11 and 13 through 15, all of the
claims in the Application, in the Office action mailed January 27, 2004.
35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 1.191(a) (2004); see also 37
C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (September 2004).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013