Ex Parte RUSSO et al - Page 11

              Appeals 2006-2874 and 2006-2747                                                        
              Applications 08/544,212 and 09/287,664                                                 
              Patent 5,401,305                                                                       
          1         Claims 29 and 31-32 are not subject to recapture essentially for the             
          2   same reasons that claim 28 is not subject to recapture.                                
          3                                                                                          
          4                         Claim 33 (Appeal 2006-2684)                                      
          5         Claim 33 reads as follows:                                                       
          6                     A film comprising one or more metal oxides                           
          7               and the deposition product of an accelerant                                
          8               wherein said metal oxide is selected from the                              
          9               group consisting of tin oxide, germanium oxide,                            
         10               titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide,                           
         11               zinc oxide, indium oxide, cadmium oxide, hafnium                           
         12               oxide, tungsten oxide, vanadium oxide, chromium                            
         13               oxide, molybdenum oxide, iridium oxide, nickel                             
         14               oxide, and tantalum oxide and wherein said                                 
         15               accelerant is selected from the group consisting of                        
         16               phosphites, borates, alkyl phosphine, arsine and                           
         17               borane derivatives, PH3, AsH3, B2H6, NF3, NO2                              
         18               and CO2, and water so that when said metal oxide                           
         19               is tin oxide said film contains the deposition                             
         20               product of at least two of said accelerants, with one                      
         21               of said accelerants being water.                                           
         22                                                                                          
         23         Notably missing from the film of claim 33 is the presence of any                 
         24   limitation relating to silicon oxide.  We note at this point, that while some          
         25   apparently believe silicon oxide is a metal oxide, the Appellants and the              
         26   Examiner agree that under the facts of this case silicon oxide is not a metal          
         27   oxide.  In this case, we assume as did Appellants and the Examiner that                
         28   silicon oxide is not a metal oxide.                                                    
         29         Claiming a film without silicon oxide would seem to be inconsistent              
         30   with the overall nature of the invention described in Appellants’ patent:              
         31   “The gaseous composition further includes a precursor for silicon dioxide              
         32   …”  Col. 4, lines 26-27.  Any film deposited on a substrate using the                  

                                                 11                                                  

Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013