Appeals 2006-2874 and 2006-2747 Applications 08/544,212 and 09/287,664 Patent 5,401,305 1 Claims 29 and 31-32 are not subject to recapture essentially for the 2 same reasons that claim 28 is not subject to recapture. 3 4 Claim 33 (Appeal 2006-2684) 5 Claim 33 reads as follows: 6 A film comprising one or more metal oxides 7 and the deposition product of an accelerant 8 wherein said metal oxide is selected from the 9 group consisting of tin oxide, germanium oxide, 10 titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, 11 zinc oxide, indium oxide, cadmium oxide, hafnium 12 oxide, tungsten oxide, vanadium oxide, chromium 13 oxide, molybdenum oxide, iridium oxide, nickel 14 oxide, and tantalum oxide and wherein said 15 accelerant is selected from the group consisting of 16 phosphites, borates, alkyl phosphine, arsine and 17 borane derivatives, PH3, AsH3, B2H6, NF3, NO2 18 and CO2, and water so that when said metal oxide 19 is tin oxide said film contains the deposition 20 product of at least two of said accelerants, with one 21 of said accelerants being water. 22 23 Notably missing from the film of claim 33 is the presence of any 24 limitation relating to silicon oxide. We note at this point, that while some 25 apparently believe silicon oxide is a metal oxide, the Appellants and the 26 Examiner agree that under the facts of this case silicon oxide is not a metal 27 oxide. In this case, we assume as did Appellants and the Examiner that 28 silicon oxide is not a metal oxide. 29 Claiming a film without silicon oxide would seem to be inconsistent 30 with the overall nature of the invention described in Appellants’ patent: 31 “The gaseous composition further includes a precursor for silicon dioxide 32 …” Col. 4, lines 26-27. Any film deposited on a substrate using the 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013