The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte TETSUO NISHIKAWA, KAZUO HARUTA, TOSHIAKI SAKAKI, and TETSUO MIZOGUCHI __________ Appeal No. 2006-2811 Application No. 09/973,646 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before GRIMES, LINCK, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to a thermoplastic resin. The examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated or obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We reverse. Background The present application was filed on October 9, 2001. The Declaration filed with the application lists four inventors. It also refers to a prior application, JP 11-95712, filed in Japan on April 2, 1999, but indicates that priority is not claimed.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013