Appeal 2006-2855 Application 09/774,727 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant invented a centralized repository for electronically storing reputation information relating to a user in a database. The user and/or third parties (e.g., community organizations) can access the database after proper verification. Such a centralized format allows the user to transport any reputation data from one community to another. The user, however, can control the dissemination of their reputation information by preventing access to the user’s reputation information unless the user authorizes releasing the information. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. A reputation authority for electronically storing reputation information relating to a user comprising: a database for storing said reputation information; security measures for verifying identities of at least one of said user and a plurality of community organizations; and a communication system for receiving said reputation information and transmitting said reputation information to said plurality of community organizations responsive to an authorization received by said user. The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show unpatentability: Coueignoux US 6,092,197 July 18, 2000 Lang US 2002/0046041 A1 Apr. 18, 2002 (filed May 10, 2001)2 The Examiner’s rejection is as follows: 2 The published application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. provisional application 60/213,638, filed June 23, 2000. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013