Appeal 2006-2855 Application 09/774,727 Similarly, the claimed invention pertains to a system for enabling retrieval of information pertaining to a user’s reputation only if the user consents to releasing such information. Since both the claimed invention and Coueignoux pertain to information retrieval, in particular, consent-based retrieval of information, they are in the same field of endeavor. For this reason alone, Coueignoux constitutes analogous art. But even if we assume, without deciding, that Coueignoux is somehow not in the same field of endeavor, the reference is certainly reasonably pertinent to the inventor’s problem – namely, providing an information retrieval system capable of transmitting certain information pertaining to a user to requesting parties responsive to the user’s authorization. "A reference is reasonably pertinent if, even though it may be in a different field from that of the inventor’s endeavor, it is one which, because of the matter with which it deals, logically would have commended itself to an inventor’s attention in considering his problem.” In re Clay, 966 F.2d 656, 659, 23 USPQ2d 1058, 1060-61 (Fed. Cir. 1992). In our view, Coueignoux’s fundamental teaching of releasing certain information requested by a sender only upon the user’s consent logically would have commended itself to the inventor’s attention in considering the problem of transmitting reputation information responsive to the user’s authorization. For at least these reasons, Coueignoux constitutes analogous art. We also find ample motivation on this record to combine Coueignoux’s teachings with Lang. Although Lang teaches providing certain security measures (i.e., determining whether the requester is authorized to access the requested information, enabling only selected parties to access the information, etc.) (Lang, ¶¶ 0042, 0023-24; Fig. 7, Step 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013