Appeal 2006-2855 Application 09/774,727 the patentability of dependent claims 2-8, 10-14, and 16-20, these claims fall with the independent claims. See In re Nielson, 816 F.2d 1567, 1572, 2 USPQ2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1987). See also 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii). DECISION We have sustained the Examiner's rejection with respect to all claims on appeal. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-20 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2004). 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013