Ex Parte Cave et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                       Ex parte STEVEN P. CAVE, NELSON G. COOK, CHRIS W.                                     
                                   BAUMGART, and KIM D. LINDER                                               
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2006-2959                                                
                                          Application 10/066,277                                             
                                          Technology Center 2600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: March 13, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and                                       
                JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1                      
                through 42 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.  We have jurisdiction under                          
                35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.                                                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013