The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SATORU AKUTSU, TETSUNAO TAKAKI, HIDEKI MEGATA,
TOSHINORI TANAKA, and TAKESHI SUGIYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2965
Application 10/320,628
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: February 21, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,
and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1
through 3 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013