Appeal 2006-2969
Application 10/394,075
Lack US 6,746,491 B2 Jun. 8, 2004
Appellant requests review of the following grounds of rejection all
advanced on appeal (Br. 5-6).
claims 1 through 7, 9 through 14, 19, and 25 through 30 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as anticipated by Trask (Answer 3-5);
claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9 through 14, 19, and 25 through 30 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Lack (id. 5-6);
claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 through 16, 19, 20, and 25 through 29 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) as anticipated by Keller (id. 6-8);
claims 3 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Lack as
applied to 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9 through 14, 19 and 25 through 30 further in
view of Katz (id. 8-9);
claims 3, 17, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Lack as
applied to 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9 through 14, 19 and 25 through 30 further in
view of Stern (id. 9-10);
claims 20 through 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Lack as
applied to 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9 through 14, 19 and 25 through 30 further in
view of Gunn (id. 10-11);
claims 23 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Lack in
view of Gunn as applied to claims 20 through 22 further in view of Katz
(id. 11);
claims 3, 5, 8, and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Keller
as applied to 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 through 16, 19, 20, and 25 through 29 further in
view of Katz (id. 11-12);
claims 3, 17, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Keller as
applied to 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 through 16, 19, 20, and 25 through 29 further in
view of Stern (id. 12-13);
claims 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Keller as
applied to 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 through 16, 19, 20, and 25 through 29 further in
view of Gunn (id. 13-14);
claims 23 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Keller in
view of Gunn as applied to claims 20 and 21 further in view of Katz (id. 14);
and
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013