Appeal 2006-3013 Application 10/367,849 this rejection. The Examiner has not shown that the additional references relied upon to reject claims 15 through 24 make up for the deficiencies noted in the rejection of independent claim 14. Accordingly, we also reverse the Examiner’s rejection of claims 15 through 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) we also now reject independent claims 14, and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious. ORDER The decision of the Examiner is reversed. This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) (effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49,960 (August 12, 2004), 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)). 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground of rejection pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review." 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) also provides that the Appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims: (1) Reopen prosecution. Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . . (2) Request rehearing. Request that the proceeding be reheard under § 41.52 by the Board upon the same record. . . . 13Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013