Ex Parte Barrett et al - Page 8

                Appeal 2006-3020                                                                                   
                Application 10/109,374                                                                             
                       4.  The Specification does not define the term “binding moiety,” but                        
                does define “binding agent” to mean “a radiopharmaceutical . . . having an                         
                affinity for and capable of binding to LTB4.”  (Spec. 15: 0392.)                                   
                Additionally, Appellants’ “binding agents . . . hav[e] a Ki < 1000 nM.”  (Id.)                     
                We adopt this definition as the broadest reasonable one for “binding                               
                moiety.”                                                                                           
                       5.  The Specification defines “aryl” (or “aromatic residue”) to mean                        
                “phenyl or naphthyl, which when substituted, the substitution can be at any                        
                position.”  (Spec. 16: 0400.)                                                                      
                       6.  The term “heteroaryl” is not defined in the Specification and thus                      
                is given its broadest reasonable interpretation.  We define this term to mean                      
                the class of heteroaryl groups derived from heteroaromatics by removal of a                        
                hydrogen atom from any ring atom; and “heteroaromatic” to mean “a closed-                          
                ring structure, usually of either 5 or 6 members, in which one or more of the                      
                atoms in the ring is an element other than carbon.”  Hawley’s Condensed                            
                Chemical Dictionary 100, 595 (11th ed. 1987).  In defining this term, we do                        
                not limit “heteroaryl” in the same way Appellants limited “aryl.”                                  
                       The meaning of the phrase “aryl or heteroaryl alkyl ether” is not                           
                defined in the Specification and thus is given its broadest reasonable                             
                interpretation.  (See Spec. 15: 0391 to 17: 0419.)  In view of the teachings in                    
                the Specification, we read this phrase to mean aryl alkyl ether or heteroaryl                      
                alkyl ether.  (See, e.g., Spec. 13: 0337-39; 15: 0388; 17-19: 0423-26; and 25:                     
                0509 to 126: 1087.)                                                                                
                       7.  Claim 39 was added by amendment in March 2004 and was                                   
                labeled “new.”  (Reply Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.111 (“2004 Reply”), at 28                         
                (filed Mar. 18, 2004).)  In their remarks, Appellants stated:  “The ‘aryl or                       

                                                        8                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013