The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KATSUHIKO SHINYAMA,
REIZO MAEDA,
YASUYUKI HARADA,
TADAYOSHI TANAKA,
YOSHINORI MATSUURA,
TOSHIYUKI NOHMA, and
IKUO YONEZU
____________
Appeal 2006-3027
Application 10/369,706
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: April 5, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-12, which are the only claims
pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013