Ex Parte Shinyama et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-3027                                                                               
                Application 10/369,706                                                                         

                      According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a nickel                           
                electrode for alkaline secondary batteries comprising a porous sintered                        
                nickel substrate loaded with a nickel hydroxide-based active material, where                   
                a first coating layer of a cobalt compound and a second coating layer of a                     
                specified compound are laid on a portion of the active material (Br. 5).                       
                Independent claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and is reproduced below:                  

                             1.  A nickel electrode for alkaline secondary battery including a                 
                      porous sintered nickel substrate loaded with a nickel hydroxide-based                    
                      active material, the nickel electrode comprising                                         
                             a first coating layer of cobalt compound laid on a surface                        
                      portion of the active material loaded into the sintered nickel substrate;                
                      and                                                                                      
                             a second coating layer laid on the first coating layer and based                  
                      on a compound of at least one element selected from the group                            
                      consisting of nickel, magnesium, calcium, barium, strontium,                             
                      scandium, yttrium, lanthanide and bismuth.                                               

                      The Examiner has relied upon the following references as evidence of                     
                obviousness:                                                                                   
                Maruta                                   US 6,245,459 B1                           Jun. 12, 2001
                Kimiya                                   US 6,261,720 B1                           Jul. 17, 2001
                                           ISSUES ON APPEAL                                                    
                      Claims 1-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable                      
                over Maruta in view of Kimiya (Answer 3).                                                      
                      Appellants contend that Maruta does not teach any second coating                         
                layer, and that the nickel oxyhydroxide layer of Maruta is a layer of active                   
                material (Br. 7-8; Reply Br. 3-4).                                                             

                                                      2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013