Appeal 2006-3027
Application 10/369,706
record, including due consideration of Appellants’ arguments, we determine
that the preponderance of evidence weighs most heavily in favor of
obviousness within the meaning of § 103(a). Therefore we affirm the
rejection of claims 1-12 under § 103(a) over Maruta in view of Kimiya.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
tf/ls
Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP
1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013