The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte PAUL BALE, ROBERT DAVID PRESCOTT, PETER NILSSON,
and ANDERS LINDQVIST
___________
Appeal No. 2006-3054
Application No. 10/672,625
Technology Center 3600
___________
HEARD: February 8, 2007
___________
Decided: March 22, 2007
___________
Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and STUART S. LEVY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 20, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013