Appeal Number: 2006-3054
Application Number: 10/672,625
The appellants have shown that the examiner erred in finding that Phoenix
discloses a conflict resolution scheme that resolves conflicts between conflicting
control schemes and recited in claims 2 to 5, 10 to 20.
The appellants have not shown that the examiner erred in finding that
Phoenix discloses a manual input to override the central control signal and the
distributed local control signal.
The appellants have shown that the examiner erred in finding that Phoenix
discloses an electrical energy for use in actuating the brake component.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013