Ex Parte Wang et al - Page 5

                Appeal 2006-3166                                                                              
                Application 09/843,582                                                                        
                the environment, or to release the material (i.e., heavy metals) without                      
                leaving the host (col. 11, ll. 7-15).                                                         
                      Andros discloses that the ionic sponge material acts as a chelating                     
                agent in removing the nickel, copper, palladium, and platinum group metals                    
                (col. 12, ll. 60-65).                                                                         

                                          PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                                   
                      A claim is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in                   
                the claim is found, either expressly or inherently described, in a single prior               
                art reference. Verdegaal Bros. Inc. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 814 F.2d                  
                628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987). When a claim covers                           
                several structures or compositions, either generically or as alternatives, the                
                claim is anticipated if any of the structures or compositions within the scope                
                of the claim is known in the prior art.  Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351,                    
                60 USPQ2d 1375, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001).                                                        
                      Claims are given their broadest reasonable interpretation in light of                   
                the specification as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art.             
                Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1316, 75 USPQ2d 1321, 1329 (Fed.                        
                Cir. 2005).  However, an applicant may be his own lexicographer by                            
                providing a special definition to a claim term that differs from the meaning it               
                would otherwise possess.  Id.  In such circumstances, applicant’s special                     
                definition would govern the meaning of the particular claim term.  Id.                        

                                                ANALYSIS                                                      
                      In order to determine whether Andros discloses a complexing agent                       
                that “chemically bond[s]” to metal particles, we must first construe the claim                

                                                      5                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013