The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. ____________ UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ NEC CORPORATION and SUMITOMO CHEMICAL CO., LTD., (United States Patent 6,357,595), Patent Owners-Appellants, v. ENTEGRIS, INC., Third-Party Requester-Respondent. ___________ Appeal 2006-3236 Inter Partes Reexamination Control No. 95/000,006 Technology Center 3900 ___________ HEARD: January 9, 2007 ___________ DECIDED: March 26, 2007 ___________ Before JOHN C. MARTIN, LEE E. BARRETT, and JAMESON LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134(b) and 315(a) by the Patent Owners after a Right of Appeal Notice finally rejecting claims 1-11 and 16. Claims 12-15 have been canceled. We affirm-in-part and enter new grounds of rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013