Ex Parte 6357595 et al - Page 2



                Appeal 2006-3236                                                                                
                Inter Partes Reexamination Control No. 95/000,006                                               

                                    INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION                                                  
                       A request was filed on December 4, 2002, by Third-Party Requester                        
                Entegris, Inc., Chaska, MN, for inter partes reexamination of U.S. Patent                       
                6,357,595 (the '595 patent) issued March 19, 2002, to Shigeru Sembonmatsu                       
                and Manubu Ishikawa, based on Application 09/559,348, filed                                     
                April 27, 2000, entitled "Tray for Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Device,"                    
                assigned to real parties in interest NEC Corporation and Sumitomo                               
                Chemical Co., Ltd., both of Japan, which claims the foreign filing priority                     
                benefit of Japanese Application 11/124326, filed April 30, 1999.                                
                       This inter partes reexamination was conducted under the regulations                      
                of 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.902-1.997 (effective Feb. 5, 2001), and 37 C.F.R.                             
                §§ 41.61-41.81 (effective September 13, 2004).  The version of the                              
                regulations does not affect any issues in the appeal.                                           
                       Both a patent owner and a third-party requester may appeal and a                         
                patent owner may be a party to any appeal taken by a third-party requester.                     
                35 U.S.C. § 315.  Thus, it is possible for the Requester, the Respondent here,                  
                to become the Appellant on appeal and for the Patent Owners, the                                
                Appellants here, to become Respondents or Cross-Appellants on appeal.                           
                To prevent confusion over the parties in any appeal from this decision, we                      
                refer in this opinion to the patent owners as the Patent Owners instead of                      
                Appellants and to the third-party requester as the Requester instead of the                     
                Respondent, except where "Appellants" and "Respondent" are used in the                          
                names of the briefs or are used in quotations.                                                  

                                                     - 2 -                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013