Appeal 2006-3236
Inter Partes Reexamination Control No. 95/000,006
Anticipation
This anticipation rejection is based on a proposed anticipation
rejection of claim 1 by the Requester, and is extended to claims 2, 9-11,
and 16. Requester found that the prior art pocket of Figure 17 of
Brahmbhatt anticipates the structure of claim 1 because it is capable of
storing a semiconductor integrated circuit device as shown in Figure 17,
reproduced below from the Comments of the 3rd Party Requestor on the
First Office Action and Amendment 6. The Examiner did not adopt the
rejection, so it has never been argued against by the Patent Owners.
The above Figure 17 is annotated by Requester to show an integrated
circuit device in dotted lines sitting on the inclined guide-in surface of a
prior art wall structure to illustrate that a device is capable of sitting on the
inclined surface. The inclined surface is labeled a "first wall surface," the
vertical surface above the inclined surface is labeled a "second wall surface,"
and the lower horizontal surface and surfaces leading to the lower edge of
the first wall surface are labeled a "bottom surface."
- 39 -
Page: Previous 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013